refactor(core): use frontmatter parser for skills#143
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbitRelease Notes
WalkthroughReplaces the hand-rolled frontmatter extractor with the ChangesFrontmatter parser replacement
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
internal/core/frontmatter_internal_test.go (1)
79-95: ⚡ Quick winRename this test to match what it exercises.
TestLoadSkillsParsesFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractornever callsLoadSkills; it only callsparseSkillFrontmatter. A more precise name will avoid false integration-scope signaling.✏️ Suggested rename
-func TestLoadSkillsParsesFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractor(t *testing.T) { +func TestParseSkillFrontmatterParsesNameDescriptionAndBody(t *testing.T) {🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@internal/core/frontmatter_internal_test.go` around lines 79 - 95, The test function TestLoadSkillsParsesFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractor has a misleading name because it does not actually call LoadSkills, only parseSkillFrontmatter. Rename this test function to accurately reflect what it tests, such as TestParseSkillFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractor, to provide clear signaling about the scope of the test and avoid confusion about what function is being exercised.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@internal/core/frontmatter_internal_test.go`:
- Around line 79-95: The test function
TestLoadSkillsParsesFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractor has a misleading name
because it does not actually call LoadSkills, only parseSkillFrontmatter. Rename
this test function to accurately reflect what it tests, such as
TestParseSkillFrontmatterWithoutExportedExtractor, to provide clear signaling
about the scope of the test and avoid confusion about what function is being
exercised.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 5949e8c3-001b-47b0-b1e0-5aa7d1e4999c
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
go.modinternal/core/frontmatter.gointernal/core/frontmatter_internal_test.gointernal/core/frontmatter_test.go
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- internal/core/frontmatter_test.go
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #143 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.36% 80.40% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 277 277
Lines 21913 21898 -15
==========================================
- Hits 17610 17607 -3
+ Misses 3086 3079 -7
+ Partials 1217 1212 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|



No description provided.