Skip to content

[utility.arg.requirements] reformat in a style like [container.reqmts]#9142

Open
notdanhan wants to merge 3 commits into
cplusplus:mainfrom
notdanhan:utility_arg_requirements
Open

[utility.arg.requirements] reformat in a style like [container.reqmts]#9142
notdanhan wants to merge 3 commits into
cplusplus:mainfrom
notdanhan:utility_arg_requirements

Conversation

@notdanhan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

It looks like this now

image

Additional work was needed to change some \tref{} to \iref{} across the document, along with two reflows of paragraphs to stop hbox badness

I did some mild rewording in source/lib-intro.tex to make it make sense in the new format. I hope to have not introduced any wording defects! :)

Comment thread source/lib-intro.tex
Comment on lines +1839 to +1840
\result
\tcode{decltype(a == b)} models \exposconceptx{boolean-testa\-ble}{boolean-testable}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to say decltype(expr) in Result? I think Result is already specifying the result type and value category of the expression in decltype-style.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm actually not sure, should I just keep the exposition concept here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants